California is facing a widespread housing crisis, partly exacerbated by the massive usage of short-term rental services like Airbnb, VRBO and similar companies.

In Malibu, short-term rentals have sometimes earned a reputation of inviting reckless tourists who disrupt neighborhoods, while some local residents have used the service as secondary income, allowing them to continue living in the area.

Though, Council Member Laura Rosenthal said she no longer rents out her home, during a June City Council meeting, she explained that her family often rented out their home for one or two weeks in the summer to go on vacation. She said during the June meeting that regulations forcing homeowners to stay on the property during short-term rentals could hurt residents who are “house rich and cash poor.”

According to the most recent census, there are 5,245 single-family residences in the city. Of those units, 150 single-family residencies have been registered with the city for short-term rental usage. Those 150 units have generated $1.2 million in transient occupancy tax for the city.

The city has claimed only six reports have been filed on two separate properties to the local code enforcement agency dedicated to managing short term rental complaints.

Malibu may have a contained problem for now, but the residents most affected by short-term rentals are concerned the business could become a Pandora’s box for enterprising property owners.

The Los Angeles area has ample examples of how business-minded landlords could take advantage of short-term rentals if they are not regulated.

Some landlords have converted their apartment complexes into short-term rental units because the revenue is significantly higher. Malibu has already seen one apartment complex turned into a pseudo motel for Airbnb after the landlord evicted all of its tenants.

The practice of flipping apartment buildings into Airbnb factories is banned in Malibu but city staff has said it is difficult to enforce the ban unless the definitions of hotels and motels are clarified.

“When we created the definition of hotels in 1993 no one was thinking about short term rentals,” City Attorney Christi Hogin said.

The City of Santa Monica took a hardline stance against short-term rentals and banned any rental shorter than 30 days where the owner of the property was not present. Santa Monica continues to allow “home-sharing,” which is defined as rentals shorter than 30 days but the owner of the property is present of the duration of the rental.

Santa Monica’s ban took effect earlier this year and began fining landlords who were not in compliance. Some landlords said the ramifications for falling out of compliance haven’t affected their business.

“Even with the $3,500 fine, that’s what one of my properties makes in a month,” Rental Operator Scott Shatford told the LA Times in July.

The simplicity of an outright ban has appealed to some Malibu residents but outlawing the practice would likely result in legal battles.

Airbnb sued the city of Santa Monica, claiming the “clumsily written law” violated first and fourth amendment rights.

“[Santa Monica] is unwilling to make necessary improvements to its draconian law, so while this isn’t a step we wanted to take, it’s the best way to protect our community of hosts and guests,” Spokesperson for Airbnb Alison Schumer told the LA Times in September.

Airbnb has also sued San Francisco and Anaheim for passing laws that restrict their service.

(4) comments

Robin Roberts

Regarding the claim that only six complaints have been filed - that is bogus. I personally know of more complaints than that from people in my neighborhood (and I am one of those complainers). Perhaps they were not to the "special" code enforcement group set up which I was not told existed when I complained multiple times, but they were complaints to the City. For all those who think this is a non-issue, I will say that until one of these rentals are near your home, you can be smug and say it's not a problem. Once one of these nightmares moves into your neighborhood you will wish the City had taken some action. Just because it doesn't affect you personally right now doesn't mean there shouldn't be action. If Malibuites believe in a City for residents, not for outside investors and visitors who come here to party and disrupt neighborhoods, they will stand against these rentals. If we believe in less traffic, fewer drunk drivers on PCH, less trash on our beaches and reduced fire danger we need restrictions. There are numerous short term rental party houses in our neighborhood that regularly cause all of these problems and I have noticed a rapid increase in conversions over the last year - so they are coming soon to a neighborhood near you...

Steve Woods

Council candidate Carl Randall is quoted “The idea that our community is being hijacked by commercial interests is appalling,”

Very interesting given he isn't forthcoming about his own foray into AirBnB which is easily viewed as a commercial development type of business invading residential areas similar to the negative impacts of more and more Drug Rehabs It's changing neighborhoods, changing lifestyles, some profitting at the expense of others, etc. All pro development 'sensibilities' they accept because they are profitting.

Potential Conflict of interest ? You bet !

Steve Woods

Thank you Lou La Monte for your work trying to restrict the commercial businesses of Rehabs that are infesting Malibu neighborhoods , hopefully the next council will address or restrict the unwanted explosion of the Air BnB commercial businesses that are exploiting areas zoned residential ,especially by out of town investors looking to maximize high end dollars at the expense to adjacent neighbors

Jon Right

"The city has claimed only six reports have been filed on two separate properties to the local code enforcement agency dedicated to managing short term rental complaints."

Oh, the horror, declare "Marshal Law"... lock them up!

OK, maybe we can hire a another Code Enforcement Officer, to monitor our neighborhood character, or just monitor our neighbor. You never know who might be staying for a weekend in the guest house, violating a code.

We have to ask; is this a real or an imaginary problem? Why can't we let the other Cities spend their money to fight these lawsuits? Or... could this non-issue be simply more political pandering?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.